Elections Just Ended - Hopeful for Continuous Beneficial Changes

Thankfully, the 2007 Mid-term elections ended relatively peaceful and the Philippines is now going thru the painful counting and canvassing process. Although the Philippine voting population have matured a bit, we still have a long way to go.

What I meant by maturing is that popularity is not the best bet anymore to being voted in public office. We see Richard Gomez and Cesar Montano faring badly in the senate race, Manny Pacquiao losing by a landslide, Christopher de Leon a non-factor in the the vice gubernatorial race in Batangas.

Also, my no. 1 reason for saying we are maturing is the defeat of Garciliano in Bukidnon. I would have either been ashamed to be called a Filipino, or would not recognize Bukidnon as a Philippine territory if Garci would have won.

On the other hand, we still see the same election related problems in Mindanao. Maguindanao and Lanao voting were obviously rigged, but the COMELEC still affords to sidestep the issue and refuses to investigate without witnesses/evidence. If you lived there, would you still vote after 2 successive elections of the same cheating? A lot of people don't have evidence their votes are not being counted and already don't want to vote anymore, what else if it's already 'garapalan' cheating like in those places?

Another point I see is people don't understand how the government works. I admit I voted for Ralph Recto. People attacked him and did not vote for him because he authored the E-VAT law. I would have thought only the masa did not vote for him because of this line of thinking, but almost everyone I know did not vote for him (which I suspect is because of E-VAT). I am not a Recto fan or a Vilmanian, I actually almost did not vote for him because of the way he reacted (angas) to his brother, who initially wanted to run for Batangas governor, but I believe and understood E-VAT was beneficial to the Philippines.

To reiterate my point, Ralph Recto did not singlehandedly impose the E-VAT law on us. To form a tax law or any other law, you need to have majority of the 200+ congressmen plus another majority of the 24 senators of the land to approve the tax law being proposed. Once you get to convince the almost 120 people to approve it in congress, the president then signs this into law if he/she approves of it. I don't understand why Recto was being singled out by the Filipino electorate on this matter? Even a well-known DZMM broadcaster was saying in his daily show -- 'Basta ako di ko boboto si Recto! Pag gusto nyo ng E-VAT eh di iboto nyo sya'.

We have to face reality. The Philippines has a huge amount of debt. Without the E-VAT law, how do you expect the Philippines to pay for it? If there is no E-VAT law, we would have borrowed more in the last 2 years, in the tune of at least P180 billion pesos additional debt.

We always talk about building a better Philippines for our children, the E-VAT law is one step towards that goal. By swallowing the bitter pill, we choose to slowly chip away at the gargantuan amount of debt that hopefully will be completely paid one day for the betterment of our country and especially for our children. As one US President once said, "It is not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country!" We always hear people complaining but give no effort in helping. When the peso was 53-56, people were complaining that peso is so devalued and commodity prices were going up. Now it's down to 45-46.50, people are now complaining that it's too low that its hurting exports and OFW families.

Nation building requires everyone's help via the Filipino trait of Bayanihan. The already in trillions of pesos of Philippine debt is not going to go away by itself. How do you want to pay for it? Start paying it now little by little, or not paying now borrowing more and your children paying for it, in addition to the Philippine Peso being worth 100+ to 1 US Dollar?